- #TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 HOW TO#
- #TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 FULL#
- #TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 TRIAL#
- #TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 SERIES#
He now lives in and embraces Canada with his husband, and a lot of gay Canadians would love to embrace him. He is a versatile star, giving and taking like a champ. Quite a feat considering he just got started in porn in 2016. At 8.5”, and known for bareback daddy scenes, it’s no wonder he won gay performer of the year in 2017. Īlex comes from Utah, and is married to fellow porn star Carter Dane. Alex Mecum image source: men.comĮDITOR’S CHOICE – JOIN BEST GAY SITES TODAY. It’s almost unbelievable how much dick this little guy can take. In addition to having a huge dick, his tiny ass loves to see exactly how huge he can take them. As a matter of fact, he’s huge, so that probably makes him some sort of porn anomaly. Don’t think because he’s that short that he isn’t packing a huge dick, though, because he is definitely not lacking in the department of dick. Oh, the best part? He’s a little spinner that only stands 4’11. Armond has been doing porn for eight years, and is a muscle bound bottom. Armond used to date fellow porn star Adam Russo, but they broke it off citing major differences in personality as the reason.
#TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 HOW TO#
He was in the Navy, so he definitely knows how to serve his country.
#TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 FULL#
FULL HD, NO ADS ★Īrmond Rizzo is a latino from Chicago whose claim to fame is taking the biggest of big dicks. ★ EDITOR’S CHOICE – JOIN PORNHUB GAY TODAY. Definitely worth a watch on netflix, but skip the purchase.22 Austin Wolf Hottest Gay Pornstars: Armond Rizzo image source: men.com image source:
#TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 SERIES#
However, I think this series was pretty poorly executed. I support this film because I believe sex workers do deserve more respect in our country and do not deserve to be vilified and ostracized. Their interviews are truncated and the interviewer is not effective. The other subjects don't fare as well-coming across as what they hope not to, pretty whiny addicts. The episode on drugs is very moving due to the openness of Nick Piston and him being given time to connect with viewers. The second disc is much better than the first. Plus, shots of the director standing over the sink or sitting outside on the phone while speaking to Harlow are mind numbing. It brings the series to a screeching halt.
#TOP 100 GAY PORN STARS 2016 TRIAL#
the devotion of a whole episode to the Harlow Cuadra trial seems out of place and doesn't follow the arch of the show. 3+ hours of the interviews is really trying on the viewer. At least take a walk with the subjects or offer a change of scenery.
the lack of film technique makes this series a snooze at points. the "questions" that are asked seem to be off the top of the head of the director and pretty random-the series title is a little off base in that the focus is pretty narrow. if you are trying to humanize adult film actors, why must they all be interviewed with their shirts off? What is someone supposed to walk away with? there is really no vision, theme or through-line to the series. the sound is pretty bad in parts, inaudible at others. Part of connecting to a subject is seeing their eyes. if you are only going to do static shot interviews with a single camera on a subject, don't place shadows in their eyes. The director clearly knows that the DVDs and series will sell based on its provocative nature, but it is pretty lackluster and has horrendous production values. They deserved better than this piecemeal project. The subjects of the film are really good sports, quite fascinating in their own right, and I applaud each and every one of them for their candor and vulnerability. He also handles questions about trauma and loss pretty casually. John is not a prolific interviewer and doesn't seem to follow any particular theme or line of questioning and often times asks really are pretty tangential and incoherent. The documentary is shot with a handheld camera (it seems like one you or I might have for home movies) and is basically 232 minutes of static shots of actors answering questions, some relevant, some not. Nick Piston is probably given the most empathetic presentation and we are allowed to connect with him when he is allowed to be vulnerable. While this may appear conceptual or artsy, essentially what it does is fail to allow viewers to emotionally connect to any of the subjects. Creator John Roecker lists a myriad of gay male porn stars in the credits but not one is given a clear narrative or arch-some appearing only once. However, the entire series suffers from stilted filmmaking and a lack of a linear structure. "Everything" is an interesting concept for a series and its male subjects are fascinating.